- PTAB · Dec 20, 2013 · IPR2014-00102 · APJ Justin T Arbes · IPR · Order
The Board withdrew the earlier judgment, granted the parties’ joint motion to terminate the proceeding, and terminated it without deciding whether to institute review.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Other PTAB motions (exclude, strike, seal, additional discovery, rehearing)Granted
“proceeding was still in the preliminary stages. Patent Owner had not yet filed a preliminary response and the Board had not yet determined whether to institute an inter partes review. Petitioner also filed a “Notice of Non-Participation” stating that it no longer intended to participate in the proceeding. Paper 5. The parties further represent that the related district court litigation involving the challenged patent was terminated based on the parties’ settlement agreement. Paper 12 at 1. The parties identify no other related matters. Under the circumstances, the Board determines that it is appropriate to terminate the proceeding without rendering a final written decision. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.72.” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 7,490,348 - PTAB · Dec 20, 2013 · IPR2014-00101 · APJ Justin T Arbes · IPR · Order
The Board withdrew its prior judgment, granted the parties’ joint motion, and terminated the proceeding based on settlement before institution.
RulingsOther- RehearingOther
“In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby: ORDERED that the judgment entered on December 4, 2013 in this proceeding is withdrawn;” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 8,312,286 - PTAB · Dec 11, 2013 · IPR2013-00066 · APJ Sally C Medley · IPR · Order
The Board granted the parties’ joint motion to terminate IPR2013-00066 without a final written decision and granted confidential treatment of their settlement and licensing agreements.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Other PTAB motions (exclude, strike, seal, additional discovery, rehearing)Granted
“the proceeding, the Board does not have before it full briefing on the trial issues and the Board has not entered a final decision. Based on the facts of this case, it is appropriate to enter judgment1 without rendering a final written decision. See 35 U.S.C. § 317(a); 37 C.F.R. § 42.72. It is ORDERED that the joint motion to terminate IPR2013-00066 is granted; FURTHER ORDERED that the proceeding is terminated; and FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ joint request that the settlement and” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 7,876,413 - PTAB · Dec 11, 2013 · IPR2013-00065 · APJ Sally C Medley · IPR · Order
The Board granted the parties’ joint motion, terminated IPR2013-00065 without a final written decision, and granted confidential treatment of the settlement and licensing agreements.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Other PTAB motions (exclude, strike, seal, additional discovery, rehearing)Granted
“the proceeding, the Board does not have before it full briefing on the trial issues and the Board has not entered a final decision. Based on the facts of this case, it is appropriate to enter judgment1 without rendering a final written decision. See 35 U.S.C. § 317(a); 37 C.F.R. § 42.72. It is ORDERED that the joint motion to terminate IPR2013-00065 is granted; FURTHER ORDERED that the proceeding is terminated; and FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ joint request that the settlement and” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 7,923,311 - PTAB · Dec 11, 2013 · IPR2013-00060 · APJ Sally C Medley · IPR · Order
The Board granted the parties’ joint motion to terminate IPR2013-00060 and terminated the proceeding without a final written decision.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Other PTAB motions (exclude, strike, seal, additional discovery, rehearing)Granted
“JUDGMENT Termination of the Proceeding 37 C.F.R. § 42.73 On December 4, 2013, the parties filed a joint motion to terminate this proceeding, along with a true copy of their written settlement and licensing agreements, made in connection with the termination of the instant proceeding, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b). Papers 27, 30, and 31. The parties also filed a joint request to have their settlement and licensing agreements treated as confidential business information under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c). Paper 28.” slip op. at 1
NonePatents in suitUS 7,697,102 - PTAB · Dec 11, 2013 · IPR2013-00064 · APJ Sally C Medley · IPR · Order
The Board granted the parties’ joint motion and terminated IPR2013-00064 without a final written decision.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Other PTAB motions (exclude, strike, seal, additional discovery, rehearing)Granted
“Based on the facts of this case, it is appropriate to enter judgment1 without rendering a final written decision. See 35 U.S.C. § 317(a); 37 C.F.R. § 42.72. It is ORDERED that the joint motion to terminate IPR2013-00064 is granted; FURTHER ORDERED that the proceeding is terminated; and FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ joint request that the settlement and licensing agreements be treated as business confidential information kept separate from the patent file, and made available only to Federal Government agencies on 1 A judgment means a final written decision by the Board, or a termination of a proceeding. 37 C.F.R. § 42.2. written request, or to any person on a showing of good cause, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), is granted.” slip op. at 2
- Adverse judgmentOther
“Based on the facts of this case, it is appropriate to enter judgment1 without rendering a final written decision. See 35 U.S.C. § 317(a); 37 C.F.R. § 42.72. It is ORDERED that the joint motion to terminate IPR2013-00064 is granted; FURTHER ORDERED that the proceeding is terminated; and FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ joint request that the settlement and” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 7,923,311 - PTAB · Dec 11, 2013 · IPR2013-00068 · APJ Sally C Medley · IPR · Order
The Board granted the parties’ joint motion to terminate IPR2013-00068, terminated the proceeding without a final written decision, and granted confidential treatment for their settlement and licensing agreements.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Other PTAB motions (exclude, strike, seal, additional discovery, rehearing)Granted
“Based on the facts of this case, it is appropriate to enter judgment1 without rendering a final written decision. See 35 U.S.C. § 317(a); 37 C.F.R. § 42.72. It is ORDERED that the joint motion to terminate IPR2013-00068 is granted; FURTHER ORDERED that the proceeding is terminated; and FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ joint request that the settlement and” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 8,068,204 - PTAB · Dec 11, 2013 · IPR2013-00038 · APJ Sally C Medley · IPR · Order
The Board granted the parties’ joint motion and terminated IPR2013-00038 without a final written decision.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Other PTAB motions (exclude, strike, seal, additional discovery, rehearing)Granted
“Based on the facts of this case, it is appropriate to enter judgment1 without rendering a final written decision. See 35 U.S.C. § 317(a); 37 C.F.R. § 42.72. It is ORDERED that the joint motion to terminate IPR2013-00038 is granted; FURTHER ORDERED that the proceeding is terminated; and” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 7,956,978 - PTAB · Nov 21, 2013 · IPR2013-00234 · APJ Lora M Green · IPR · Order
The Board granted the parties’ joint motion and terminated the instituted proceeding under their settlement, without a final written decision.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted
“A decision by the Board to institute a trial was entered on September 25, 2013. Paper 17. This matter, however, is in the preliminary stages. The parties have not identified any other related matters between them. Under these circumstances, the Board determines that it is appropriate to enter judgment2 and terminate the trial without rendering a final written decision. 37 C.F.R. § 42.72.” slip op. at 2
- PTAB / AIA Trials › Other PTAB motions (exclude, strike, seal, additional discovery, rehearing)Granted
“to a settlement. On November 15, 2013, the Board authorized the parties to file a joint request to terminate the proceeding and to file the settlement agreement as business confidential under 37 C.F.R. 42.74(c). Paper 32. On that same day, the parties filed a joint motion to terminate, Paper 30, and to treat the settlement agreement as business confidential, Paper 31.1 See 35 U.S.C. § 317(a); 37 C.F.R. § 42.72. With their motion to terminate and to treat the settlement agreement as business confidential, the parties also filed a copy of a written settlement agreement. Paper 31 (Exhibit A).” slip op. at 2
None - PTAB · Nov 19, 2013 · IPR2013-00197 · APJ Lora M Green · IPR · Order
The Board granted the parties’ joint motion and terminated the proceeding after settlement, without a final written decision.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)Other
“A decision by the Board to institute a trial was entered on September 23, 2013. Paper No. 16. This matter, however, is in the preliminary stages. The parties have not identified any other related matters between them. Under these circumstances, the Board determines that it is appropriate to enter judgment2 and terminate the trial without rendering a final written decision. 37 C.F.R. § 42.72.” slip op. at 2
- PTAB / AIA Trials › Other PTAB motions (exclude, strike, seal, additional discovery, rehearing)Granted
“to a settlement. On, November 7, 2013, the Board authorized the parties to file a joint request to terminate and to file the settlement agreement as business confidential under 37 C.F.R. 42.74(c). Paper No. 23. On, November 11, 2013, the parties filed a joint motion to terminate and to treat the settlement agreement as business confidential.1 Paper No. 22. See 35 U.S.C. § 317(a); 37 C.F.R. § 42.72. With their motion to terminate and to treat the settlement agreement as business confidential, the parties also filed a copy of a written settlement agreement. Paper No. 22, Ex. 2001 (Confidential Exhibit a A).” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 8,204,561
Holdings, summaries, rulings, issues, outcomes, winners and claim constructions shown for a decision were generated by a large language model reading the opinion. They are a guide to the decision, not the decision. Confirm every one against the court's own text before relying on it. Outcomes read from the patent owner’s side. Party names are extracted from the decision and are missing on about 900 short Director denials and scans, which carry the trial number instead.