- PTAB · Dec 26, 2017 · IPR2017-02201 · APJ Daniel J Galligan · IPR · Order
The Board dismissed the petition and terminated the proceeding as to all parties because the parties had settled their dispute.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)Other
“and 37 C.F.R. § 42.72, these sections relate, respectively, to termination of “[a]n inter partes review instituted under this chapter” and to termination of “trial,” which “means a contested case instituted by the Board based upon a petition.” 35 U.S.C. § 317; 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.2, 42.72. This proceeding is in the preliminary stage, and no decision whether to institute a trial has been made. As such, we treat the parties’ request as seeking dismissal of the Petition to thereby terminate the proceeding.” slip op. at 2
- PTAB / AIA Trials › Other PTAB motions (exclude, strike, seal, additional discovery, rehearing)Granted
“U.S. Patent No. 6,684,060 B1. Mot. 3–4. The parties represent that “there are no other agreements or understandings, oral or written, between DTS and Avago, including any collateral agreements, made in connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination of the present proceeding.” Mot. 3. Under these circumstances, we determine that it is appropriate to dismiss the Petition (Paper 1) and terminate this proceeding. See 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.71(a), 42.74(a). We also determine that it is appropriate to treat the Agreements as business confidential information to be kept separate from the patent file. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 6,684,060 - Ipr2016-00892OtherPTAB · Sep 28, 2017 · IPR2016-00892 · IPR · Order
Final Written Decision
NonePatents in suitUS 8,884,762 - Pgr2017-00003OtherPTAB · Jun 20, 2017 · PGR2017-00003 · PGR · Order
The supplied document contains no decision text, so its disposition and grounds cannot be determined.
NonePatents in suitUS 9,254,240 - Ipr2016-01235OtherPTAB · Jun 1, 2017 · IPR2016-01235 · IPR · Order
Final Written Decision Document
NonePatents in suitUS 7,864,983 - Ipr2016-00963OtherPTAB · Mar 29, 2017 · IPR2016-00963 · IPR · Order
The supplied document contains only a blank page, so no decision or claim outcome can be determined.
NonePatents in suitUS 6,829,634 - Ipr2016-00964OtherPTAB · Mar 29, 2017 · IPR2016-00964 · IPR · Order
The supplied document unit contains no decision text, so the outcome for IPR2016-00964 cannot be determined.
NonePatents in suitUS 6,829,634 - Ipr2015-01828OtherPTAB · Mar 7, 2017 · IPR2015-01828 · IPR · Order
EXPUNGED
NonePatents in suitUS 6,091,940
Holdings, summaries, rulings, issues, outcomes, winners and claim constructions shown for a decision were generated by a large language model reading the opinion. They are a guide to the decision, not the decision. Confirm every one against the court's own text before relying on it. Outcomes read from the patent owner’s side. Party names are extracted from the decision and are missing on about 900 short Director denials and scans, which carry the trial number instead.