- Ipr2026-00360InstitutedPTAB · Oct 19, 2026 · IPR2026-00360 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution
The Director granted institution of IPR2026-00360 after finding the petitioner showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.
RulingsInstitution decision- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted
“the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 12,271,636 - Ipr2026-00349OtherPTAB · Oct 19, 2026 · IPR2026-00349 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Order
Institution of IPR2026-00349 was granted after the Director found the petition showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted
“Pursuant 35 U.S.C. §§ 314(a) and 324(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 12,375,890 - Ipr2026-00348InstitutedPTAB · Oct 19, 2026 · IPR2026-00348 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution
The Director granted institution in IPR2026-00348, finding the petition met the applicable threshold and no other non-discretionary considerations warranted denial.
RulingsInstitution decision- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted
“Pursuant 35 U.S.C. §§ 314(a) and 324(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings: IPR2026-00316 IPR2026-00358 IPR2026-003744” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 11,997,568 - Ipr2026-00316InstitutedPTAB · Oct 19, 2026 · IPR2026-00316 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution
The Director granted institution of IPR2026-00316 after finding the petition showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim and no other non-discretionary consideration warranted denial.
RulingsInstitution decision- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted
“the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 11,664,123 - Ipr2026-00375Institution deniedPTAB · Oct 19, 2026 · IPR2026-00375 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Director review
The Director denied institution of IPR2026-00375 after reviewing discretionary and non-merits considerations.
RulingsDirector review decision- Director reviewDirector review, deniedDenied
“Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 314(a), after review of discretionary and non-merits considerations, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceeding: IPR2026-002631 IPR2026-003752 1 Opinion forthcoming. 2 IPR2026-00375 challenges the same patent as in IPR2026-00300 that was included on the Notice mailed July 14, 2026, with the indication that an opinion would be forthcoming. After further consideration, however, there will be no opinion in these proceedings.” slip op. at 1
- Other 314aInstitution denied discretionary otherInstitution denied
“Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 314(a), after review of discretionary and non-merits considerations, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceeding: IPR2026-002631 IPR2026-003752 1 Opinion forthcoming. 2 IPR2026-00375 challenges the same patent as in IPR2026-00300 that was included on the Notice mailed July 14, 2026, with the indication that an opinion would be forthcoming. After further consideration, however, there will be no opinion in these proceedings.” slip op. at 1
Discretionary denialPatents in suitUS 7,583,191 - Ipr2026-00263Institution deniedPTAB · Oct 19, 2026 · IPR2026-00263 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Director review
The Director denied institution of IPR2026-00263 after reviewing discretionary and non-merits considerations.
RulingsDirector review decision- Director reviewDirector review, deniedDenied
“Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 314(a), after review of discretionary and non-merits considerations, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceeding: IPR2026-002631 IPR2026-003752 1 Opinion forthcoming. 2 IPR2026-00375 challenges the same patent as in IPR2026-00300 that was included on the Notice mailed July 14, 2026, with the indication that an opinion would be forthcoming. After further consideration, however, there will be no opinion in these proceedings.” slip op. at 1
- Other 314aInstitution denied discretionary otherInstitution denied
“Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 314(a), after review of discretionary and non-merits considerations, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceeding: IPR2026-002631 IPR2026-003752” slip op. at 1
Discretionary denialPatents in suitUS 11,875,275 - Pgr2026-00034InstitutedPTAB · Oct 8, 2026 · PGR2026-00034 · APJ John A Squires · PGR · Institution
Institution of PGR2026-00034 is granted because the petitioner showed the required likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.
RulingsInstitution decision- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted
“Pursuant 35 U.S.C. §§ 314(a) and 324(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings:1” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 12,419,895 - Ipr2026-00364InstitutedPTAB · Oct 8, 2026 · IPR2026-00364 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution
Institution of inter partes review is granted for IPR2026-00364 because the petitioner showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.
RulingsInstitution decision- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted
“the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings:1” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 12,301,627 - Ipr2026-00339InstitutedPTAB · Oct 8, 2026 · IPR2026-00339 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution
Institution of inter partes review in IPR2026-00339 is granted after the petitioner showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.
RulingsInstitution decision- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted
“the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings:1” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 11,644,693 - Ipr2026-00373Institution deniedPTAB · Oct 8, 2026 · IPR2026-00373 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Director review
The Director denied institution in IPR2026-00373 after reviewing discretionary and non-merits considerations.
RulingsDirector review decision- Director reviewDirector review, deniedDenied
“NOTICE Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 314(a) and 324(a), after review of discretionary and non-merits considerations, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is denied in the following proceeding: IPR2026-00373 PGR2026-00055” slip op. at 1
Discretionary denialPatents in suitUS 12,274,325
Holdings, summaries, rulings, issues, outcomes, winners and claim constructions shown for a decision were generated by a large language model reading the opinion. They are a guide to the decision, not the decision. Confirm every one against the court's own text before relying on it. Outcomes read from the patent owner’s side. Party names are extracted from the decision and are missing on about 900 short Director denials and scans, which carry the trial number instead.