• Ipr2025-01391Instituted
  PTAB · Jan 27, 2026 · IPR2025-01391 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

  The Director granted institution of IPR2025-01391 after finding the petition showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim and no other non-discretionary consideration warranted denial.

  RulingsInstitution decision

  • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

    “Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a) and § 324(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as applicable, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review or post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings: IPR2025-01367 IPR2025-01391 PGR2025-00070 IPR2025-01374” slip op. at 2

  • Settled expectationsNot reached

    “Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a) and § 324(a), after review of discretionary considerations, the following proceedings will be reviewed for merits and non-discretionary considerations: IPR2025-01271 IPR2025-01573 IPR2025-01598 IPR2025-01457 IPR2025-01574 PGR2025-00084 IPR2025-01540 IPR2025-01575 PGR2025-00086 IPR2025-01541 IPR2025-01588 PGR2025-00088 IPR2025-01566 IPR2025-01593 PGR2025-00089 IPR2025-01567 Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a) and § 324(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as applicable, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review or post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2

  Discretionary denial
  Patents in suitUS 10,758,652

Holdings, summaries, rulings, issues, outcomes, winners and claim constructions shown for a decision were generated by a large language model reading the opinion. They are a guide to the decision, not the decision. Confirm every one against the court's own text before relying on it. Outcomes read from the patent owner’s side. Party names are extracted from the decision and are missing on about 900 short Director denials and scans, which carry the trial number instead.