• US Conec Ltd. v. Senko Advanced Components, Inc.Rehearing granted
  PTAB · Sep 16, 2024 · IPR2024-00122 · APJ Barbara A Parvis · IPR · Rehearing

  The Board granted the petitioner's request to withdraw its rehearing request and granted the joint motion to terminate the proceeding.

  RulingsRehearing decision

  • RehearingRehearing, grantedGranted

    “agreement to jointly seek termination of this proceeding, and “[b]ased on the settlement, Petitioner hereby requests withdrawal of its Request for Rehearing.” Joint Motion 1. We “may enter non-final orders to administer the proceeding.” 37 C.F.R. § 42.5. Here, the Board has not decided the merits of Petitioner’s Request for Rehearing. Additionally, we stated in our Decision Denying Institution that “the Petition is denied, and no trial is instituted.” Paper 7, 22. Under these circumstances, therefore, we determine that it is appropriate to grant the request to withdraw Petitioner’s Request for Rehearing and terminate this proceeding as to the Parties. III. ORDER Accordingly, for the reasons discussed above, it is: ORDERED that Petitioner’s request for withdrawal of its Request for Rehearing (Paper 8) is granted; and” slip op. at 2

  • PTAB / AIA Trials › Other PTAB motions (exclude, strike, seal, additional discovery, rehearing)Granted

    “agreement to jointly seek termination of this proceeding, and “[b]ased on the settlement, Petitioner hereby requests withdrawal of its Request for Rehearing.” Joint Motion 1. We “may enter non-final orders to administer the proceeding.” 37 C.F.R. § 42.5. Here, the Board has not decided the merits of Petitioner’s Request for Rehearing. Additionally, we stated in our Decision Denying Institution that “the Petition is denied, and no trial is instituted.” Paper 7, 22. Under these circumstances, therefore, we determine that it is appropriate to grant the request to withdraw Petitioner’s Request for Rehearing and terminate this proceeding as to the Parties.” slip op. at 2

  None
  Patents in suitUS 11,061,190
• Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. Prisua Engineering Corp.Rehearing granted
  PTAB · Sep 27, 2018 · IPR2017-01188 · APJ Matthew R Clements · IPR · Rehearing

  The Board granted Patent Owner’s rehearing request and authorized it to re-file its Sur-Reply by September 28, 2018.

  RulingsRehearing decision

  • RehearingRehearing, grantedGranted

    “reply “as a matter of right,” and does not address explicitly whether a Patent Owner may file a sur-reply in a case that was instituted prior to the Trial Practice Guide Update. Because the Trial Practice Guide Update did not authorize Patent Owner to file its Sur-Reply “as a matter of right,” we are not persuaded that we erred in determining that Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply was unauthorized.” slip op. at 5

  • Strike new argumentGranted

    “Notwithstanding all of the above, and out of an abundance of fairness to Patent Owner, Patent Owner is authorized to re-file its Sur-Reply no later than Friday, September 28, 2018.” slip op. at 6

  None
  Patents in suitUS 8,650,591

Holdings, summaries, rulings, issues, outcomes, winners and claim constructions shown for a decision were generated by a large language model reading the opinion. They are a guide to the decision, not the decision. Confirm every one against the court's own text before relying on it. Outcomes read from the patent owner’s side. Party names are extracted from the decision and are missing on about 900 short Director denials and scans, which carry the trial number instead.