- PTAB · Apr 22, 2014 · IPR2014-00428 · APJ Jo-Anne M Kokoski · IPR · Order
The Board granted the parties’ settlement-related requests and terminated the proceeding before deciding whether to institute trial.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)Not reached
“This matter is a preliminary proceeding1 and a decision on whether to institute the trial has not been made. Under these circumstances, it is appropriate to terminate the proceeding. The joint motion to terminate the proceeding is granted.” slip op. at 2
- PTAB / AIA Trials › Other PTAB motions (exclude, strike, seal, additional discovery, rehearing)Granted
“The parties requested that this proceeding be terminated pursuant to a settlement. On April 16, 2014, the Board authorized the parties to file a joint motion to terminate and to request that the settlement agreement be treated as business confidential information pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b). Paper 14. The parties filed the Joint Motion to Terminate Under 35 U.S.C. § 317 on April 17, 2014. Paper 15. Accompanying the motion, the parties filed a true copy of a settlement agreement with a Joint Request to File Settlement Agreement as Business Confidential Information Under 35 U.S.C. § 317 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74. Paper 16.” slip op. at 2
None
Holdings, summaries, rulings, issues, outcomes, winners and claim constructions shown for a decision were generated by a large language model reading the opinion. They are a guide to the decision, not the decision. Confirm every one against the court's own text before relying on it. Outcomes read from the patent owner’s side. Party names are extracted from the decision and are missing on about 900 short Director denials and scans, which carry the trial number instead.