- PTAB · Dec 20, 2013 · IPR2014-00102 · APJ Justin T Arbes · IPR · Order
The Board withdrew the earlier judgment, granted the parties’ joint motion to terminate the proceeding, and terminated it without deciding whether to institute review.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Other PTAB motions (exclude, strike, seal, additional discovery, rehearing)Granted
“proceeding was still in the preliminary stages. Patent Owner had not yet filed a preliminary response and the Board had not yet determined whether to institute an inter partes review. Petitioner also filed a “Notice of Non-Participation” stating that it no longer intended to participate in the proceeding. Paper 5. The parties further represent that the related district court litigation involving the challenged patent was terminated based on the parties’ settlement agreement. Paper 12 at 1. The parties identify no other related matters. Under the circumstances, the Board determines that it is appropriate to terminate the proceeding without rendering a final written decision. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.72.” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 7,490,348 - PTAB · Dec 20, 2013 · IPR2014-00101 · APJ Justin T Arbes · IPR · Order
The Board withdrew its prior judgment, granted the parties’ joint motion, and terminated the proceeding based on settlement before institution.
RulingsOther- RehearingOther
“In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby: ORDERED that the judgment entered on December 4, 2013 in this proceeding is withdrawn;” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 8,312,286
Holdings, summaries, rulings, issues, outcomes, winners and claim constructions shown for a decision were generated by a large language model reading the opinion. They are a guide to the decision, not the decision. Confirm every one against the court's own text before relying on it. Outcomes read from the patent owner’s side. Party names are extracted from the decision and are missing on about 900 short Director denials and scans, which carry the trial number instead.