PTAB
Advanced fields
1 decision · 369msnewest first
  • PTAB · Sep 10, 2014 · IPR2014-00336 · APJ Scott E Kamholz · IPR · Order

    The Board granted the parties’ joint motion and terminated IPR2014-00336 as to all parties; it did not decide patentability.

    RulingsOther
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Other PTAB motions (exclude, strike, seal, additional discovery, rehearing)Granted

      “The parties filed a joint motion to terminate the instant proceeding (Paper 13 (“Mot.”)), and a true copy of their written settlement agreement (Ex. 1005) made in connection with the termination, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 317 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b). The parties also jointly requested that their settlement agreement be treated as business confidential information under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c). Mot. 2-3. For the reasons provided below, the joint motion to terminate is granted. The joint request that the settlement agreement be treated as business confidential information is also granted.” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 8,622,984

Holdings, summaries, rulings, issues, outcomes, winners and claim constructions shown for a decision were generated by a large language model reading the opinion. They are a guide to the decision, not the decision. Confirm every one against the court's own text before relying on it. Outcomes read from the patent owner’s side. Party names are extracted from the decision and are missing on about 900 short Director denials and scans, which carry the trial number instead.