• Opentv, Inc. v. Cisco Technology, Inc.Other
  PTAB · Feb 4, 2014 · IPR2013-00329 · APJ Justin T Arbes · IPR · Order

  The Board granted the parties’ joint motion to terminate the instituted trial based on settlement, without a final written decision.

  RulingsOther

  • PTAB / AIA Trials › Other PTAB motions (exclude, strike, seal, additional discovery, rehearing)Granted

    “JUDGMENT Termination of the Proceeding 37 C.F.R. § 42.73 On January 31, 2014, the parties filed a joint motion (Paper 19) to terminate the instant proceeding on the basis of a settlement reached by the parties. See 35 U.S.C. § 317(a); 37 C.F.R. § 42.72. The parties also filed a copy of their written settlement agreement (Exhibit 2002) and a request” slip op. at 1

  None
  Patents in suitUS 6,252,964
• Opentv, Inc. v. Cisco Technology, Inc.Other
  PTAB · Feb 4, 2014 · IPR2013-00328 · APJ Justin T Arbes · IPR · Order

  The Board granted the parties’ joint motion and terminated the instituted proceeding based on settlement, without a final written decision.

  RulingsOther

  • PTAB / AIA Trials › Other PTAB motions (exclude, strike, seal, additional discovery, rehearing)Granted

    “instituted a trial on November 29, 2013, and Patent Owner has not yet filed its response or any motion to amend claims. The parties further represent that they have agreed to dismissal of the pending district court litigation between the parties involving Patent 6,744,892 B2. See Paper 22 at 2. The parties identify no other related matters. Under the circumstances, the Board determines that it is appropriate to terminate the trial without rendering a final written decision. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.72.” slip op. at 2

  None
  Patents in suitUS 6,744,892

Holdings, summaries, rulings, issues, outcomes, winners and claim constructions shown for a decision were generated by a large language model reading the opinion. They are a guide to the decision, not the decision. Confirm every one against the court's own text before relying on it. Outcomes read from the patent owner’s side. Party names are extracted from the decision and are missing on about 900 short Director denials and scans, which carry the trial number instead.