PTAB
Advanced fields
1 decision · 459msnewest first
  • PTAB · Apr 24, 2014 · IPR2014-00146 · APJ Lora M Green · IPR · Adverse judgment

    The Board entered adverse judgment against Superior Communications, Inc. and terminated the proceeding before institution.

    RulingsAdverse judgment
    • Adverse judgmentAdverse judgmentGranted

      “Petitioner’s request to terminate the proceeding under 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b)(4) is treated as a statement that it is abandoning the contest, and is thus requesting adverse judgment against itself. 1 This case is in the preliminary proceeding2 stage; no institution of a trial has been made. Based on the facts of this case, it is appropriate to enter judgment, and the proceeding is terminated.3” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 8,204,561

Holdings, summaries, rulings, issues, outcomes, winners and claim constructions shown for a decision were generated by a large language model reading the opinion. They are a guide to the decision, not the decision. Confirm every one against the court's own text before relying on it. Outcomes read from the patent owner’s side. Party names are extracted from the decision and are missing on about 900 short Director denials and scans, which carry the trial number instead.