• Caterpillar Inc. v. Wirtgen America, Inc.Rehearing granted
  PTAB · Jul 11, 2019 · IPR2017-02185 · APJ Barry L Grossman · IPR · Rehearing

  The Board granted Patent Owner’s rehearing request, vacated the original final written decision, and will issue a corrected decision grouping claims 18–20 and 30–32 with claims 17 and 29.

  RulingsRehearing decision

  • RehearingRehearing, grantedGranted

    “decision for an abuse of discretion. 37 C.F.R. § 42.71(c). An abuse of discretion may arise if the decision is based on an erroneous interpretation of law, if a factual finding is not supported by substantial evidence, or if an unreasonable judgment is made in weighing relevant factors. Star Fruits S.N.C. v. U.S., 393 F.3d 1277, 1281 (Fed. Cir. 2005); Arnold P’ship v. Dudas, 362 F.3d 1338, 1340 (Fed. Cir. 2004); In re Gartside, 203 F.3d 1305, 1315–16 (Fed. Cir. 2000).” slip op. at 2

  None
  Patents in suitUS 7,828,309

Holdings, summaries, rulings, issues, outcomes, winners and claim constructions shown for a decision were generated by a large language model reading the opinion. They are a guide to the decision, not the decision. Confirm every one against the court's own text before relying on it. Outcomes read from the patent owner’s side. Party names are extracted from the decision and are missing on about 900 short Director denials and scans, which carry the trial number instead.