PTAB
Advanced fields
1 decision · 274msnewest first
  • PTAB · Mar 19, 2024 · IPR2024-00564 · APJ Thu A Dang · IPR · Adverse judgment

    The Board granted Patent Owner’s request for adverse judgment after it disclaimed claims 1–25 before institution, leaving no claim for consideration.

    RulingsAdverse judgment
    • Adverse judgmentAdverse judgmentGranted

      “Our Rules provide that “[a]ctions construed to be a request for adverse judgment include: . . . [c]ancellation or disclaimer of a claim such that the Owner’s disclaimer of claims 1–25 leaves no claim remaining in the trial. Therefore, pursuant to our Rules, we construe this disclaimer as a request for adverse judgment, which we grant.” slip op. at 2

    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Joinder §315(c) / SAS all-or-nothingNot reached

      “Petition requesting an inter partes review of claims 1–25 (“the challenged claims”) of U.S. Patent No. 8,506,649 B2 (Ex. 1001, “the ’649 patent). Paper 2 (“Petition”). Along with the Petition, Petitioner filed a Motion for Joinder to inter partes review IPR2023-01185. Paper 3 (“Motion”).” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 8,506,649

Holdings, summaries, rulings, issues, outcomes, winners and claim constructions shown for a decision were generated by a large language model reading the opinion. They are a guide to the decision, not the decision. Confirm every one against the court's own text before relying on it. Outcomes read from the patent owner’s side. Party names are extracted from the decision and are missing on about 900 short Director denials and scans, which carry the trial number instead.