- PTAB · Apr 15, 2014 · IPR2013-00186 · APJ Jennifer M Meyer · IPR · Order
The Board granted the parties’ joint motion to terminate IPR2013-00186 after settlement, without a final written decision.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Other PTAB motions (exclude, strike, seal, additional discovery, rehearing)Granted
“The documents to be expunged were submitted after institution of trial and were not considered by the Board in instituting trial. Furthermore, redacted versions of these confidential documents remain a part of the record; the parties do not seek to expunge the corresponding redacted documents. Based on the facts in this case and the termination of the proceedings, we hereby grant the parties’ joint motion to withdrawn their Motions to Seal and to expunge specific exhibits from the record.” slip op. at 4
- ExcludeGranted
“FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ joint motion to expunge Paper 41 (unredacted version), Paper 50 (unredacted version), Paper 60 (unredacted version), Paper 66 (unredacted version), Exhibit 1033 (unredacted version), Exhibit 1034 (unredacted version), Exhibit 1035 (unredacted version), Exhibit 1036 (unredacted version), Exhibit 2009 (unredacted version), Exhibit 2010 (unredacted version), Exhibit 2011 (unredacted version), Exhibit 2012 (unredacted version), Exhibit 2013 (unredacted version), Exhibit 2014 (unredacted version), Exhibit 2015 (unredacted version), Exhibit 2016 (unredacted version), Exhibit 2017 (unredacted version), Exhibit 2021 (unredacted version), and Exhibit 2047 (unredacted version) is GRANTED; and upon entry of this decision, those exhibits will be expunged from the record of the instant proceedings.” slip op. at 5
NonePatents in suitUS 7,785,334 - PTAB · Apr 15, 2014 · IPR2013-00184 · APJ Georgianna W Braden · IPR · Order
The Board granted the parties’ joint motions, terminated the inter partes review without a final written decision, and granted their requests concerning confidentiality, withdrawal, and expungement.
RulingsOther- ExcludeMotion to exclude, grantedGranted
“In the joint motion, the parties state that the documents to be expunged were submitted after institution of trial and had not been considered by the Board in instituting trial. Furthermore, redacted versions of these confidential documents remain a part of the record; the parties do not seek to expunge such redacted documents. Based on the facts in this case and the termination of the proceedings, we hereby grant the parties’ joint motion to withdrawn their Motions to Seal and to expunge specific exhibits from the record.” slip op. at 4
NonePatents in suitUS 7,806,905 - PTAB · Apr 15, 2014 · IPR2013-00189 · APJ Georgianna W Braden · IPR · Order
The Board granted the parties’ joint motion to terminate IPR2013-00189 after settlement, without deciding the merits.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Other PTAB motions (exclude, strike, seal, additional discovery, rehearing)Granted
“Based on the facts in this case and the termination of the proceedings, we hereby grant the parties’ joint motion to withdrawn their Motions to Seal and to expunge specific exhibits from the record.” slip op. at 4
NonePatents in suitUS 7,785,334 - PTAB · Apr 15, 2014 · IPR2013-00188 · APJ Georgianna W Braden · IPR · Order
The Board granted the parties’ joint motions to terminate IPR2013-00188 and expunge specified unredacted documents after settlement, without a final written decision.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Other PTAB motions (exclude, strike, seal, additional discovery, rehearing)Granted
“In the joint motion, the parties state that the documents to be expunged were submitted after institution of trial and had not been considered by the Board in instituting trial. Furthermore, redacted versions of these confidential documents remain a part of the record; the parties do not seek to expunge such redacted documents. Based on the facts in this case and the termination of the proceedings, we hereby grant the parties’ joint motion to withdrawn their Motions to Seal and to expunge specific exhibits from the record.” slip op. at 4
NonePatents in suitUS 7,785,334 - PTAB · Apr 15, 2014 · IPR2013-00185 · APJ Georgianna W Braden · IPR · Order
The Board granted the parties’ joint motion and terminated IPR2013-00185 without a final written decision because they settled all disputes involving the ’905 patent.
RulingsOther- ExcludeMotion to exclude, grantedGranted
“In the joint motion, the parties state that the documents to be expunged were submitted after institution of trial and had not been considered by the Board in instituting trial. Furthermore, redacted versions of these confidential documents remain a part of the record; the parties do not seek to expunge such redacted documents. Based on the facts in this case and the termination of the proceedings, we hereby grant the parties’ joint motion to withdrawn their Motions to Seal and to expunge specific exhibits from the record.” slip op. at 4
NonePatents in suitUS 7,806,905 - PTAB · Apr 15, 2014 · IPR2013-00187 · APJ Jennifer M Meyer · IPR · Order
The Board granted the parties’ joint motions, treated the settlement agreement as confidential, and terminated IPR2013-00187 without a final written decision.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Other PTAB motions (exclude, strike, seal, additional discovery, rehearing)Granted
“The documents to be expunged were submitted after institution of trial and were not considered by the Board in instituting trial. Furthermore, redacted versions of these confidential documents remain a part of the record; the parties do not seek to expunge the corresponding redacted documents. Based on the facts in this case and the termination of the proceedings, we hereby grant the parties’ joint motion to withdrawn their Motions to Seal and to expunge specific exhibits from the record.” slip op. at 4
NonePatents in suitUS 7,785,334 - PTAB · Sep 4, 2013 · IPR2013-00456 · APJ Michael R Zecher · IPR · Order
The Board granted the parties’ joint motion and terminated the proceeding before institution; it rendered no institution decision or final written decision.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Other PTAB motions (exclude, strike, seal, additional discovery, rehearing)Granted
“not yet filed its preliminary response and the Board has not instituted a trial. The parties further represent that the pending district court litigation with respect to U.S. Patent No. 7,516,287 B2 has been dismissed without prejudice. Paper 12 at 2-3; see also Ex. 1007. The parties identify no other related matters. Under the circumstances, the Board determines that it is appropriate to terminate this proceeding without rendering either a decision to institute or a final written decision. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.72.” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 7,516,287 - PTAB · Sep 4, 2013 · IPR2013-00457 · APJ Michael R Zecher · IPR · Order
The Board granted the parties’ joint motion and terminated the proceeding without instituting trial or issuing a final written decision.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Other PTAB motions (exclude, strike, seal, additional discovery, rehearing)Granted
“terminate this proceeding. See 35 U.S.C. § 317(a); 37 C.F.R. § 42.72. The parties also filed a copy of their written settlement agreement (Exhibit 1006)1 and a request (Paper 12) to treat the settlement agreement as business confidential information under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c). This proceeding is still in the preliminary stages. Patent Owner has not yet filed its preliminary response and the Board has not instituted a trial. The parties further represent that the pending district court litigation with respect to U.S. Patent No. 7,849,361 B2 has been dismissed without prejudice. Paper 11 at 2-3; see also Ex. 1007. The parties identify no other related matters. Under the circumstances, the Board determines that it is appropriate to terminate this proceeding without rendering either a decision to institute or a final written decision. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.72.” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 7,849,361
Holdings, summaries, rulings, issues, outcomes, winners and claim constructions shown for a decision were generated by a large language model reading the opinion. They are a guide to the decision, not the decision. Confirm every one against the court's own text before relying on it. Outcomes read from the patent owner’s side. Party names are extracted from the decision and are missing on about 900 short Director denials and scans, which carry the trial number instead.