PTAB
Advanced fields
5,447 decisions · 465msnewest first
  • PTAB · Sep 9, 2026 · IPR2026-00257 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Order

    The Director granted institution of IPR2026-00257 after finding the petition showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsOther
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “Pursuant 35 U.S.C. §§ 314(a) and 324(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings: IPR2026-00256 IPR2026-00312 IPR2026-00327 IPR2026-00257 IPR2026-00313 IPR2026-00334 IPR2026-00258 IPR2026-00314 PGR2026-00044 IPR2026-00259” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 11,041,020
  • Ipr2026-00256Instituted
    PTAB · Sep 9, 2026 · IPR2026-00256 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

    Institution of IPR2026-00256 is granted because the petitioner showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “Pursuant 35 U.S.C. §§ 314(a) and 324(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings: IPR2026-00256 IPR2026-00312 IPR2026-00327 IPR2026-00257 IPR2026-00313 IPR2026-00334 IPR2026-00258 IPR2026-00314 PGR2026-00044 IPR2026-00259” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 11,014,982
  • PTAB · Sep 2, 2026 · PGR2026-00033 · PGR · Order

    Institution of PGR2026-00033 was granted after the petitioner showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim, with no other non-discretionary basis for denial.

    RulingsOther
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “Pursuant 35 U.S.C. §§ 314(a) and 324(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings: IPR2026-00271 IPR2026-00274 PGR2026-00032 IPR2026-00272 IPR2026-00275 PGR2026-00033 IPR2026-00273 IPR2026-00326” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 12,417,756
  • PTAB · Sep 2, 2026 · PGR2026-00032 · APJ John A Squires · PGR · Order

    The Director granted institution of PGR2026-00032 after finding the petition showed the required likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsOther
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “Pursuant 35 U.S.C. §§ 314(a) and 324(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings: IPR2026-00271 IPR2026-00274 PGR2026-00032 IPR2026-00272 IPR2026-00275 PGR2026-00033 IPR2026-00273 IPR2026-00326” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 12,412,561
  • Ipr2026-00326Instituted
    PTAB · Sep 2, 2026 · IPR2026-00326 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

    The Director granted institution of IPR2026-00326 after finding the petition showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “Pursuant 35 U.S.C. §§ 314(a) and 324(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 12,301,628
  • Ipr2026-00275Instituted
    PTAB · Sep 2, 2026 · IPR2026-00275 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

    The Director granted institution of IPR2026-00275.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 11,715,457
  • Ipr2026-00274Instituted
    PTAB · Sep 2, 2026 · IPR2026-00274 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

    The Director granted institution of IPR2026-00274 after finding the petition showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2

    None
  • PTAB · Sep 2, 2026 · IPR2026-00273 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Order

    Institution of IPR2026-00273 is granted after the petitioner showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim, with no other nondiscretionary reason to deny institution.

    RulingsOther
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “Pursuant 35 U.S.C. §§ 314(a) and 324(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 12,125,496
  • Ipr2026-00272Instituted
    PTAB · Sep 2, 2026 · IPR2026-00272 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

    Institution of IPR2026-00272 is granted because the petitioner showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “Pursuant 35 U.S.C. §§ 314(a) and 324(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 11,948,550
  • Ipr2026-00271Instituted
    PTAB · Sep 2, 2026 · IPR2026-00271 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

    Institution of IPR2026-00271 was granted because the petitioner showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “Pursuant 35 U.S.C. §§ 314(a) and 324(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings: IPR2026-00271 IPR2026-00274 PGR2026-00032 IPR2026-00272 IPR2026-00275 PGR2026-00033 IPR2026-00273 IPR2026-00326” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 9,491,564

Holdings, summaries, rulings, issues, outcomes, winners and claim constructions shown for a decision were generated by a large language model reading the opinion. They are a guide to the decision, not the decision. Confirm every one against the court's own text before relying on it. Outcomes read from the patent owner’s side. Party names are extracted from the decision and are missing on about 900 short Director denials and scans, which carry the trial number instead.