- Ipr2026-00117OtherPTAB · May 6, 2026 · IPR2026-00117 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Order
The Director denied institution of IPR2026-00117 after determining that the petitioner failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)Institution denied meritsInstitution denied
“Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 12,166,869 - Ipr2026-00145OtherPTAB · Apr 28, 2026 · IPR2026-00145 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Order
The Director granted institution in IPR2026-00145 after finding a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim and no other non-discretionary basis for denial.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted
“petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is granted in the following proceedings: IPR2026-00106 IPR2026-00145 IPR2026-00148 IPR2026-00129” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 11,128,710 - Ipr2026-00124OtherPTAB · Apr 22, 2026 · IPR2026-00124 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Order
The Director granted institution of IPR2026-00124 after finding a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim and no other discretionary consideration warranted denial.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted
“petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, and no other non- discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is granted in the following proceedings: IPR2026-00095 IPR2026-00121 IPR2026-00130 IPR2026-00100 IPR2026-00124” slip op. at 1
NonePatents in suitUS 11,096,797 - Ipr2026-00121OtherPTAB · Apr 22, 2026 · IPR2026-00121 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Order
The Director granted institution of IPR2026-00121 after finding a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim and no discretionary reason to deny.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted
“petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, and no other non- discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is granted in the following proceedings: IPR2026-00095 IPR2026-00121 IPR2026-00130 IPR2026-00100 IPR2026-00124” slip op. at 1
NonePatents in suitUS 11,864,755 - Ipr2026-00050OtherPTAB · Apr 14, 2026 · IPR2026-00050 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Order
The Director granted institution of IPR2026-00050 because the petitioner showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim and no nondiscretionary consideration warranted denial.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted
“petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 8,631,102 - Pgr2026-00003OtherPTAB · Apr 1, 2026 · PGR2026-00003 · APJ John A Squires · PGR · Order
The Director granted institution of PGR2026-00003 after finding the petition met the merits threshold and no non-discretionary consideration warranted denial.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted
“IPR2025-01588 Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a) and § 324(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review or post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 12,193,790 - Ipr2026-00069OtherPTAB · Mar 23, 2026 · IPR2026-00069 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Order
This notice lists IPR2026-00069 among proceedings granted institution after the petitioner showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted
“petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is granted in the following proceedings: IPR2025-01310 IPR2025-01577 IPR2026-00059 IPR2025-01575 IPR2025-01598 IPR2026-00069” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 11,938,201 - Ipr2025-01575OtherPTAB · Mar 23, 2026 · IPR2025-01575 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Order
The Director granted institution of IPR2025-01575 after finding a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim and no non-discretionary reason to deny institution.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted
“petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is granted in the following proceedings: IPR2025-01310 IPR2025-01577 IPR2026-00059 IPR2025-01575 IPR2025-01598 IPR2026-00069” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 11,753,046 - Ipr2025-01540OtherPTAB · Mar 10, 2026 · IPR2025-01540 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Order
Institution of inter partes review was granted in IPR2025-01540 because the petitioner showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted
“petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is granted in the following proceedings: IPR2025-01444 IPR2025-01530 IPR2025-01541 IPR2025-01529 IPR2025-01540” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 10,129,627 - Ipr2025-01524OtherPTAB · Feb 24, 2026 · IPR2025-01524 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Order
The Director granted institution of IPR2025-01524 after finding a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim and no other nondiscretionary reason to deny institution.
RulingsOther- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted
“Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 9,123,186
Holdings, summaries, rulings, issues, outcomes, winners and claim constructions shown for a decision were generated by a large language model reading the opinion. They are a guide to the decision, not the decision. Confirm every one against the court's own text before relying on it. Outcomes read from the patent owner’s side. Party names are extracted from the decision and are missing on about 900 short Director denials and scans, which carry the trial number instead.