PTAB
Advanced fields
1,906 decisions · 383msnewest first
  • Ipr2025-01206Instituted
    PTAB · Dec 23, 2025 · IPR2025-01206 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

    The Director granted institution in IPR2025-01206, finding the petition met the institution threshold and no non-discretionary consideration warranted denial.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as applicable, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review or post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 1

    None
    Patents in suitUS 11,950,105
  • Ipr2025-01205Instituted
    PTAB · Dec 23, 2025 · IPR2025-01205 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Director review

    The Director granted institution in IPR2025-01205 because the petition showed the required likelihood of success and no non-discretionary considerations warranted denial.

    RulingsDirector review decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as applicable, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review or post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 1

    None
    Patents in suitUS 12,003,976
  • PTAB · Dec 23, 2025 · IPR2025-01204 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Order

    The Director granted institution in IPR2025-01204 after finding the petition showed the required likelihood of success and no other non-discretionary consideration warranted denial.

    RulingsOther
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as applicable, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review or post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings: IPR2025-010611 IPR2025-01205 PGR2025-00067 IPR2025-01173 IPR2025-01206 PGR2025-00068 IPR2025-01188 IPR2025-01207 PGR2025-00069 IPR2025-01189 IPR2025-01208 IPR2025-01203 IPR2025-01209 IPR2025-01204 IPR2025-01270” slip op. at 1

    None
    Patents in suitUS 11,818,591
  • Ipr2025-01203Instituted
    PTAB · Dec 23, 2025 · IPR2025-01203 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

    The Director granted institution in IPR2025-01203 after finding the petition showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a) and § 324(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as applicable, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review or post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings: IPR2025-010611 IPR2025-01205 PGR2025-00067 IPR2025-01173 IPR2025-01206 PGR2025-00068 IPR2025-01188 IPR2025-01207 PGR2025-00069 IPR2025-01189 IPR2025-01208 IPR2025-01203 IPR2025-01209 IPR2025-01204 IPR2025-01270” slip op. at 1

    None
    Patents in suitUS 11,849,337
  • Ipr2025-01189Instituted
    PTAB · Dec 23, 2025 · IPR2025-01189 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Director review

    The Director granted institution of IPR2025-01189 after finding the petition met the merits threshold and no non-discretionary consideration warranted denial.

    RulingsDirector review decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as applicable, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review or post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings: IPR2025-010611 IPR2025-01205 PGR2025-00067 IPR2025-01173 IPR2025-01206 PGR2025-00068 IPR2025-01188 IPR2025-01207 PGR2025-00069 IPR2025-01189 IPR2025-01208 IPR2025-01203 IPR2025-01209 IPR2025-01204 IPR2025-01270” slip op. at 1

    None
    Patents in suitUS 11,368,911
  • Ipr2025-01188Instituted
    PTAB · Dec 23, 2025 · IPR2025-01188 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Director review

    Institution was granted in IPR2025-01188 after the Director found the petition met the statutory merits threshold and no non-discretionary considerations warranted denial.

    RulingsDirector review decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a) and § 324(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as applicable, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review or post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings: IPR2025-010611 IPR2025-01205 PGR2025-00067 IPR2025-01173 IPR2025-01206 PGR2025-00068 IPR2025-01188 IPR2025-01207 PGR2025-00069 IPR2025-01189 IPR2025-01208 IPR2025-01203 IPR2025-01209 IPR2025-01204 IPR2025-01270” slip op. at 1

    • Director reviewOther

      “1 This proceeding is stayed until further notice in view of the pending Director Review of the institution decisions in IPR2024-00757, IPR2024- 00759, IPR2024-00760, IPR2024-00767, IPR2024-00768, IPR2024-00769, and IPR2024-00770.” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 11,272,535
  • Ipr2025-01173Instituted
    PTAB · Dec 23, 2025 · IPR2025-01173 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

    The Director granted institution in IPR2025-01173 after finding the petition showed the required likelihood of prevailing and no other non-discretionary considerations warranted denial.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as applicable, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review or post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 1

    • Director reviewOther

      “Before JOHN A. SQUIRES, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.” slip op. at 1

    None
    Patents in suitUS 11,673,805
  • PTAB · Dec 23, 2025 · IPR2025-01061 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Order

    Institution was granted in IPR2025-01061 because the petitioner showed the required likelihood of prevailing and no other non-discretionary considerations warranted denial.

    RulingsOther
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a) and § 324(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as applicable, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review or post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings: IPR2025-010611 IPR2025-01205 PGR2025-00067 IPR2025-01173 IPR2025-01206 PGR2025-00068 IPR2025-01188 IPR2025-01207 PGR2025-00069 IPR2025-01189 IPR2025-01208 IPR2025-01203 IPR2025-01209 IPR2025-01204 IPR2025-01270” slip op. at 1

    None
    Patents in suitUS 11,763,316
  • Pgr2025-00061Institution denied
    PTAB · Dec 23, 2025 · PGR2025-00061 · APJ John A Squires · PGR · Director review

    The Director denied institution of PGR2025-00061 after finding the petitioner failed to meet the applicable merits threshold.

    RulingsDirector review decision
    • Director reviewDirector review, deniedDenied

      “Before JOHN A. SQUIRES, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. NOTICE Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a) and § 324(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as applicable. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review or post-grant review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 1

    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)Institution denied meritsInstitution denied

      “NOTICE Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a) and § 324(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as applicable. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review or post-grant review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 1

    None
    Patents in suitUS 12,110,780
  • Ipr2025-01183Institution denied
    PTAB · Dec 23, 2025 · IPR2025-01183 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

    Institution of IPR2025-01183 was denied because the petitioner failed to show the required likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)Institution denied meritsInstitution denied

      “NOTICE Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a) and § 324(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as applicable. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review or post-grant review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 1

    None
    Patents in suitUS 11,687,971

Holdings, summaries, rulings, issues, outcomes, winners and claim constructions shown for a decision were generated by a large language model reading the opinion. They are a guide to the decision, not the decision. Confirm every one against the court's own text before relying on it. Outcomes read from the patent owner’s side. Party names are extracted from the decision and are missing on about 900 short Director denials and scans, which carry the trial number instead.