• Larose Industries, LLC v. Choon’S Design, LLCAdverse judgment
  PTAB · Jul 7, 2014 · IPR2014-00218 · APJ Grace Karaffa Obermann · IPR · Adverse judgment

  The Board granted the joint motion and entered adverse judgment against Patent Owner after it disclaimed challenged claims 1, 5-8, 10, and 11.

  RulingsAdverse judgment

  • Adverse judgmentAdverse judgmentGranted

    “DISCUSSION A party may request entry of judgment against itself at any time during a proceeding. 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b). Actions construed as a request for adverse judgment include cancellation or disclaimer of patent claims, such that the party has no remaining claim in the trial. 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b)(2). Patent Owner has filed a statutory disclaimer that leaves no patent claim remaining in this inter partes review. Paper 16 at 2, Ex. A. Under these circumstances, entry of judgment adverse to Patent Owner is appropriate.” slip op. at 2

  None
  Patents in suitUS 8,485,565

Holdings, summaries, rulings, issues, outcomes, winners and claim constructions shown for a decision were generated by a large language model reading the opinion. They are a guide to the decision, not the decision. Confirm every one against the court's own text before relying on it. Outcomes read from the patent owner’s side. Party names are extracted from the decision and are missing on about 900 short Director denials and scans, which carry the trial number instead.