- Ipr2026-00146InstitutedPTAB · May 6, 2026 · IPR2026-00146 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution
The Director granted institution of IPR2026-00146 after finding the petition met the reasonable-likelihood threshold and no non-discretionary consideration warranted denial.
RulingsInstitution decision- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted
“merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review or post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 12,316,706 - Ipr2026-00122InstitutedPTAB · May 6, 2026 · IPR2026-00122 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution
The Director granted institution of IPR2026-00122 after finding the petition showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim and no non-discretionary bar to institution.
RulingsInstitution decision- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted
“merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review or post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 10,714,890 - Ipr2026-00065InstitutedPTAB · May 6, 2026 · IPR2026-00065 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution
The Director granted institution of IPR2026-00065 after finding a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.
RulingsInstitution decision- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted
“merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review or post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings: IPR2026-00065 IPR2026-00146 IPR2026-00150 IPR2026-00122 IPR2026-00147 PGR2026-00013 IPR2026-00123” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 11,107,768 - Ipr2026-00149Institution deniedPTAB · May 6, 2026 · IPR2026-00149 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution
Institution of IPR2026-00149 was denied because the petitioner failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.
RulingsInstitution decision- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)Institution denied meritsInstitution denied
“Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 12,013,326 - Ipr2026-00119Institution deniedPTAB · May 6, 2026 · IPR2026-00119 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution
The Director denied institution of IPR2026-00119 because the petitioner failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.
RulingsInstitution decision- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)Institution denied meritsInstitution denied
“Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 11,916,893 - Ipr2026-00118Institution deniedPTAB · May 6, 2026 · IPR2026-00118 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution
Institution of IPR2026-00118 was denied because the petitioner failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.
RulingsInstitution decision- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)Institution denied meritsInstitution denied
“Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 12,207,094 - Ipr2026-00114Institution deniedPTAB · May 6, 2026 · IPR2026-00114 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution
The Director denied institution of IPR2026-00114 because the petitioner failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.
RulingsInstitution decision- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)Institution denied meritsInstitution denied
“Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 11,233,780 - Ipr2026-00148InstitutedPTAB · Apr 28, 2026 · IPR2026-00148 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution
The Director granted institution of IPR2026-00148 after finding a reasonable likelihood of success on at least one challenged claim and no other non-discretionary basis for denial.
RulingsInstitution decision- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted
“petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 11,190,590 - Ipr2026-00129InstitutedPTAB · Apr 28, 2026 · IPR2026-00129 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution
The Director granted institution of IPR2026-00129 after finding a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim and no other nondiscretionary basis to deny institution.
RulingsInstitution decision- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted
“petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 12,158,250 - Ipr2026-00106InstitutedPTAB · Apr 28, 2026 · IPR2026-00106 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution
The Director granted institution of IPR2026-00106 after finding a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim and no non-discretionary basis to deny institution.
RulingsInstitution decision- PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted
“petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2
NonePatents in suitUS 10,321,320
Holdings, summaries, rulings, issues, outcomes, winners and claim constructions shown for a decision were generated by a large language model reading the opinion. They are a guide to the decision, not the decision. Confirm every one against the court's own text before relying on it. Outcomes read from the patent owner’s side. Party names are extracted from the decision and are missing on about 900 short Director denials and scans, which carry the trial number instead.