PTAB
Advanced fields
3,024 decisions · 326msnewest first
  • Pgr2026-00012Instituted
    PTAB · May 19, 2026 · PGR2026-00012 · PGR · Institution

    Institution of PGR2026-00012 was granted because the petitioner showed the required likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 12,221,196
  • Ipr2026-00163Instituted
    PTAB · May 19, 2026 · IPR2026-00163 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

    The Director granted institution of IPR2026-00163 after finding a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner would prevail on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 11,376,136
  • Ipr2026-00162Instituted
    PTAB · May 19, 2026 · IPR2026-00162 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

    The Director granted institution of IPR2026-00162 after finding a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim and no other basis to deny institution.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings: IPR2026-00159 IPR2026-001623 PGR2026-00012 IPR2026-00160 IPR2026-00163” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 12,011,367
  • Ipr2026-00160Instituted
    PTAB · May 19, 2026 · IPR2026-00160 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

    The Director granted institution of IPR2026-00160 after finding the petitioner showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim and no non-discretionary consideration warranted denial.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings: IPR2026-001512 Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a) and § 324(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings: IPR2026-00159 IPR2026-001623 PGR2026-00012 IPR2026-00160 IPR2026-00163” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 11,880,207
  • Ipr2026-00159Instituted
    PTAB · May 19, 2026 · IPR2026-00159 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

    The Director granted institution of IPR2026-00159 after finding a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 11,262,766
  • Ipr2026-00158Instituted
    PTAB · May 15, 2026 · IPR2026-00158 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

    The Director granted institution of IPR2026-00158 after finding the petition showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 11,003,191
  • Ipr2026-00143Instituted
    PTAB · May 15, 2026 · IPR2026-00143 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

    Institution of IPR2026-00143 is granted.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is granted in the following proceedings: IPR2026-00061 IPR2026-00067 IPR2026-00143 IPR2026-00066 IPR2026-00131 IPR2026-00158” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 12,001,599
  • Ipr2026-00131Instituted
    PTAB · May 15, 2026 · IPR2026-00131 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

    The Director granted institution of IPR2026-00131 after finding the petition showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings: IPR2026-00167 IPR2026-00168 IPR2026-00176 Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a) and § 324(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 10,966,025
  • Ipr2026-00067Instituted
    PTAB · May 15, 2026 · IPR2026-00067 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

    Institution of inter partes review in IPR2026-00067 is granted.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 11,894,306
  • PTAB · May 15, 2026 · IPR2026-00066 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Order

    Institution of IPR2026-00066 is granted after the petitioner showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsOther
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 11,538,763

Holdings, summaries, rulings, issues, outcomes, winners and claim constructions shown for a decision were generated by a large language model reading the opinion. They are a guide to the decision, not the decision. Confirm every one against the court's own text before relying on it. Outcomes read from the patent owner’s side. Party names are extracted from the decision and are missing on about 900 short Director denials and scans, which carry the trial number instead.