PTAB
Advanced fields
3,041 decisions · 429msnewest first
  • PTAB · Oct 19, 2026 · IPR2026-00363 · APJ Hung H Bui · IPR · Order

    The Board granted Palo Alto Networks’ motion and joined it as an understudy petitioner in IPR2026-00298, subject to participation limits.

    RulingsOther
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Joinder §315(c) / SAS all-or-nothingJoinder, grantedGranted

      “As moving party, Petitioner bears the burden of proving that it is entitled to the requested relief. 37 C.F.R. § 42.20(c). A motion for joinder should (1) set forth the reasons joinder is appropriate; (2) identify any new grounds of unpatentability asserted in the petition; and (3) explain what impact (if any) joinder would have on the trial schedule for the existing review. See Kyocera Corp. v. SoftView, LLC, IPR2013-00004, Paper 15 at 4 (PTAB Apr. 24, 2013). We determine that Petitioner has met its burden of showing that joinder is appropriate. Petitioner represents, and Patent Owner does not dispute, that both the Petition and the supporting declaration (by Mark Crovella, Ph.D., Ex. 1003) in this proceeding are “substantively identical” to those in the Microsoft IPR. Mot. 1, 3–8.” slip op. at 3

    None
    Patents in suitUS 12,143,424
  • Ipr2026-00360Instituted
    PTAB · Oct 19, 2026 · IPR2026-00360 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

    The Director granted institution of IPR2026-00360 after finding the petitioner showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 12,271,636
  • PTAB · Oct 19, 2026 · IPR2026-00349 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Order

    Institution of IPR2026-00349 was granted after the Director found the petition showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsOther
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “Pursuant 35 U.S.C. §§ 314(a) and 324(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 12,375,890
  • Ipr2026-00348Instituted
    PTAB · Oct 19, 2026 · IPR2026-00348 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

    The Director granted institution in IPR2026-00348, finding the petition met the applicable threshold and no other non-discretionary considerations warranted denial.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “Pursuant 35 U.S.C. §§ 314(a) and 324(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings: IPR2026-00316 IPR2026-00358 IPR2026-003744” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 11,997,568
  • Ipr2026-00316Instituted
    PTAB · Oct 19, 2026 · IPR2026-00316 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

    The Director granted institution of IPR2026-00316 after finding the petition showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim and no other non-discretionary consideration warranted denial.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 11,664,123
  • Pgr2026-00034Instituted
    PTAB · Oct 8, 2026 · PGR2026-00034 · APJ John A Squires · PGR · Institution

    Institution of PGR2026-00034 is granted because the petitioner showed the required likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “Pursuant 35 U.S.C. §§ 314(a) and 324(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings:1” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 12,419,895
  • Ipr2026-00364Instituted
    PTAB · Oct 8, 2026 · IPR2026-00364 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

    Institution of inter partes review is granted for IPR2026-00364 because the petitioner showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings:1” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 12,301,627
  • Ipr2026-00339Instituted
    PTAB · Oct 8, 2026 · IPR2026-00339 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

    Institution of inter partes review in IPR2026-00339 is granted after the petitioner showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings:1” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 11,644,693
  • Ipr2026-00325Instituted
    PTAB · Oct 8, 2026 · IPR2026-00325 · IPR · Institution

    The Board instituted IPR2026-00325 after finding a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner would prevail on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “Pursuant 35 U.S.C. §§ 314(a) and 324(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings:1” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 12,301,627
  • Pgr2026-00043Instituted
    PTAB · Sep 23, 2026 · PGR2026-00043 · APJ John A Squires · PGR · Institution

    The Board granted institution of PGR2026-00043 after finding a reasonable likelihood that at least one challenged claim is unpatentable.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)InstitutedInstituted

      “the petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate, and no other non-discretionary considerations warrant denial of institution. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is granted in the following proceedings: IPR2026-00336 PGR2026-00037 PGR2026-00043 IPR2026-00363 PGR2026-00042” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 12,543,922
Page 1 of 305
← Previous12345…Next →

Holdings, summaries, rulings, issues, outcomes, winners and claim constructions shown for a decision were generated by a large language model reading the opinion. They are a guide to the decision, not the decision. Confirm every one against the court's own text before relying on it. Outcomes read from the patent owner’s side. Party names are extracted from the decision and are missing on about 900 short Director denials and scans, which carry the trial number instead.