PTAB
Advanced fields
3,975 decisions · 499msnewest first
  • Ipr2026-00320Institution denied
    PTAB · Jul 28, 2026 · IPR2026-00320 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Director review

    The Director denied institution of IPR2026-00320 after review of discretionary and non-merits considerations.

    RulingsDirector review decision
    • Other 314aInstitution denied discretionary otherInstitution denied

      “NOTICE Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of discretionary and non- merits considerations, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings: IPR2026-00320 IPR2026-00321 IPR2026-00322 Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 314(a) and 324(a), after review of” slip op. at 1

    Discretionary denial
    Patents in suitUS 8,780,887
  • Ipr2026-00230Institution denied
    PTAB · Jul 28, 2026 · IPR2026-00230 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

    Institution of inter partes review in IPR2026-00230 was denied because the petitioner failed to show the required likelihood of prevailing.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)Institution denied meritsInstitution denied

      “Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 11,824,136
  • Pgr2026-00027Institution denied
    PTAB · Jul 21, 2026 · PGR2026-00027 · APJ John A Squires · PGR · Institution

    The Board denied institution of PGR2026-00027 because the petitioner failed to show that at least one challenged claim was more likely than not unpatentable.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)Institution denied meritsInstitution denied

      “Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 12,297,278
  • Ipr2026-00270Institution denied
    PTAB · Jul 21, 2026 · IPR2026-00270 · IPR · Institution

    Institution of IPR2026-00270 was denied because the petitioner failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)Institution denied meritsInstitution denied

      “Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition, or that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable, as appropriate. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 12,298,313
  • Ipr2026-00310Institution denied
    PTAB · Jul 14, 2026 · IPR2026-00310 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Director review

    The Director denied institution of IPR2026-00310 after review of discretionary and non-merits considerations.

    RulingsDirector review decision
    • Director reviewDirector review, deniedDenied

      “NOTICE Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of discretionary and non- merits considerations, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 1

    Discretionary denial
    Patents in suitUS 12,063,402
  • Ipr2026-00309Institution denied
    PTAB · Jul 14, 2026 · IPR2026-00309 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Director review

    The Director denied institution of IPR2026-00309 after finding the petitioner failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsDirector review decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)Institution denied meritsInstitution denied

      “Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 10,741,071
  • Ipr2026-00308Institution denied
    PTAB · Jul 14, 2026 · IPR2026-00308 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Director review

    Institution of IPR2026-00308 was denied after review of discretionary and non-merits considerations.

    RulingsDirector review decision
    • Director reviewDirector review, deniedDenied

      “NOTICE Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of discretionary and non- merits considerations, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 1

    Discretionary denial
    Patents in suitUS 11,017,668
  • Ipr2026-00307Institution denied
    PTAB · Jul 14, 2026 · IPR2026-00307 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Director review

    The Director denied institution of IPR2026-00307 after review of discretionary and non-merits considerations.

    RulingsDirector review decision
    • Other 314aInstitution denied discretionary otherInstitution denied

      “NOTICE Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of discretionary and non- merits considerations, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 1

    • Director reviewDirector review, deniedDenied

      “Before JOHN A. SQUIRES, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. NOTICE Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of discretionary and non- merits considerations, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 1

    Discretionary denial
    Patents in suitUS 11,164,456
  • Ipr2026-00306Institution denied
    PTAB · Jul 14, 2026 · IPR2026-00306 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Director review

    The Director denied institution of IPR2026-00306 after reviewing discretionary and non-merits considerations.

    RulingsDirector review decision
    • Director reviewDirector review, deniedDenied

      “NOTICE Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of discretionary and non- merits considerations, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 1

    Discretionary denial
    Patents in suitUS 10,916,138
  • Ipr2026-00305Institution denied
    PTAB · Jul 14, 2026 · IPR2026-00305 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Director review

    Institution of IPR2026-00305 was denied because the petitioner failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsDirector review decision
    • Director reviewDirector review, deniedDenied

      “NOTICE Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of discretionary and non- merits considerations, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings: IPR2026-00255 IPR2026-00284 IPR2026-00307 IPR2026-00261 IPR2026-00300* IPR2026-00308 IPR2026-00281 IPR2026-00305 IPR2026-00309” slip op. at 1

    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)Other

      “NOTICE Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of discretionary and non- merits considerations, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings: IPR2026-00255 IPR2026-00284 IPR2026-00307 IPR2026-00261 IPR2026-00300* IPR2026-00308 IPR2026-00281 IPR2026-00305 IPR2026-00309” slip op. at 1

    None
    Patents in suitUS 7,840,427

Holdings, summaries, rulings, issues, outcomes, winners and claim constructions shown for a decision were generated by a large language model reading the opinion. They are a guide to the decision, not the decision. Confirm every one against the court's own text before relying on it. Outcomes read from the patent owner’s side. Party names are extracted from the decision and are missing on about 900 short Director denials and scans, which carry the trial number instead.