PTAB
Advanced fields
1 decision · 256msnewest first
  • PTAB · Jan 15, 2020 · IPR2019-01574 · APJ Scott Raevsky · IPR · Institution

    The Board denied institution because Patent Owner statutorily disclaimed challenged claims 16 and 19.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • Adverse judgmentAdverse judgmentDenied

      “the ’949 patent. Ex. 2001. Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.107(e), “patent owner may file a statutory disclaimer under 35 U.S.C. 253(a) in compliance with § 1.321(a) of this chapter, disclaiming one or more claims in the patent,” and “[n]o inter partes review will be instituted based on disclaimed claims.” A disclaimer under 35 U.S.C. § 253(a) is “considered as part of the original” slip op. at 2

    Discretionary denial
    Patents in suitUS 7,339,949

Holdings, summaries, rulings, issues, outcomes, winners and claim constructions shown for a decision were generated by a large language model reading the opinion. They are a guide to the decision, not the decision. Confirm every one against the court's own text before relying on it. Outcomes read from the patent owner’s side. Party names are extracted from the decision and are missing on about 900 short Director denials and scans, which carry the trial number instead.