PTAB
Advanced fields
1 decision · 272msnewest first
  • PTAB · Oct 1, 2021 · IPR2021-00806 · APJ Garth D Baer · IPR · Institution

    The Board denied institution on claims 1–3 because Patent Owner disclaimed all claims of the ’903 patent.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • Adverse judgmentAdverse judgmentDenied

      “We agree with Patent Owner. Under our rules, “[n]o inter partes review will be instituted based on disclaimed claims.” 37 C.F.R. § 42.107(e). Because we cannot institute trial on disclaimed claims, we do not institute an inter partes review of claims 1–3.” slip op. at 2

    Discretionary denial
    Patents in suitUS 9,747,903

Holdings, summaries, rulings, issues, outcomes, winners and claim constructions shown for a decision were generated by a large language model reading the opinion. They are a guide to the decision, not the decision. Confirm every one against the court's own text before relying on it. Outcomes read from the patent owner’s side. Party names are extracted from the decision and are missing on about 900 short Director denials and scans, which carry the trial number instead.