PTAB
Advanced fields
3,358 decisions · 292msnewest first
  • Ipr2026-00340Institution denied
    PTAB · Oct 8, 2026 · IPR2026-00340 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

    The Director denied institution of IPR2026-00340 because the petitioner failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)Institution denied meritsInstitution denied

      “Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings: IPR2026-00340” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 11,644,693
  • Pgr2026-00055Institution denied
    PTAB · Oct 8, 2026 · PGR2026-00055 · APJ John A Squires · PGR · Director review

    The Director denied institution of PGR2026-00055 after reviewing discretionary and non-merits considerations.

    RulingsDirector review decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Discretionary denialInstitution denied discretionary otherInstitution denied

      “NOTICE Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 314(a) and 324(a), after review of discretionary and non-merits considerations, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is denied in the following proceeding: IPR2026-00373 PGR2026-00055” slip op. at 1

    Discretionary denial
    Patents in suitUS 12,233,106
  • Ipr2026-00373Institution denied
    PTAB · Oct 8, 2026 · IPR2026-00373 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Director review

    The Director denied institution in IPR2026-00373 after reviewing discretionary and non-merits considerations.

    RulingsDirector review decision
    • Director reviewDirector review, deniedDenied

      “NOTICE Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 314(a) and 324(a), after review of discretionary and non-merits considerations, institution of inter partes review and post-grant review is denied in the following proceeding: IPR2026-00373 PGR2026-00055” slip op. at 1

    Discretionary denial
    Patents in suitUS 12,274,325
  • Ipr2026-00337Institution denied
    PTAB · Sep 23, 2026 · IPR2026-00337 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

    Institution of IPR2026-00337 was denied because the petitioner failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)Institution denied meritsInstitution denied

      “Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings: IPR2026-00331 IPR2026-00332 IPR2026-00337 Pursuant 35 U.S.C. §§ 314(a) and 324(a), after review of the merits,” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 10,512,385
  • Ipr2026-00332Institution denied
    PTAB · Sep 23, 2026 · IPR2026-00332 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

    Institution of IPR2026-00332 was denied because the petitioner failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)Institution denied meritsInstitution denied

      “Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 11,921,355
  • Ipr2026-00331Institution denied
    PTAB · Sep 23, 2026 · IPR2026-00331 · IPR · Institution

    Institution of IPR2026-00331 was denied because the petitioner failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)Institution denied meritsInstitution denied

      “Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 11,921,355
  • Ipr2026-00371Institution denied
    PTAB · Sep 23, 2026 · IPR2026-00371 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Director review

    The Director denied institution in IPR2026-00371 after reviewing discretionary and non-merits considerations.

    RulingsDirector review decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Discretionary denialInstitution denied discretionary otherInstitution denied

      “NOTICE Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of discretionary and non- merits considerations, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceeding: IPR2026-00351 IPR2026-00362 IPR2026-00371 Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 314(a) and 324(a), after review of” slip op. at 1

    Discretionary denial
    Patents in suitUS 12,143,425
  • Ipr2026-00362Institution denied
    PTAB · Sep 23, 2026 · IPR2026-00362 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Director review

    The Director denied institution of IPR2026-00362 after review of discretionary and non-merits considerations.

    RulingsDirector review decision
    • Other 314aInstitution denied discretionary otherInstitution denied

      “NOTICE Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of discretionary and non- merits considerations, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceeding: IPR2026-00351 IPR2026-00362 IPR2026-00371 Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 314(a) and 324(a), after review of” slip op. at 1

    Discretionary denial
    Patents in suitUS 11,539,663
  • Ipr2026-00351Institution denied
    PTAB · Sep 23, 2026 · IPR2026-00351 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Director review

    The Director denied institution of IPR2026-00351 after determining that the petitioner failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsDirector review decision
    • Director reviewDirector review, deniedDenied

      “Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2

    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)Institution denied meritsInstitution denied

      “Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 11,878,049
  • Ipr2026-00304Institution denied
    PTAB · Sep 2, 2026 · IPR2026-00304 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Institution

    Institution of IPR2026-00304 was denied because the petitioner failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.

    RulingsInstitution decision
    • PTAB / AIA Trials › Institution threshold (reasonable likelihood / more likely than not)Institution denied meritsInstitution denied

      “Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of the merits, the petitioner has failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition. Accordingly, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceeding: IPR2026-00304” slip op. at 2

    None
    Patents in suitUS 8,438,120
Page 1 of 336
← Previous12345…Next →

Holdings, summaries, rulings, issues, outcomes, winners and claim constructions shown for a decision were generated by a large language model reading the opinion. They are a guide to the decision, not the decision. Confirm every one against the court's own text before relying on it. Outcomes read from the patent owner’s side. Party names are extracted from the decision and are missing on about 900 short Director denials and scans, which carry the trial number instead.