- Ipr2025-01491Institution deniedPTAB · Dec 18, 2025 · IPR2025-01491 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Director review
The Director denied institution in IPR2025-01491 after reviewing discretionary considerations under § 314(a).
RulingsDirector review decision- Other 314aInstitution denied discretionary otherInstitution denied
“Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of discretionary considerations, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 1
Discretionary denialPatents in suitUS 7,904,686 - Ipr2025-01490Institution deniedPTAB · Dec 18, 2025 · IPR2025-01490 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Director review
The Director denied institution of IPR2025-01490 after reviewing discretionary considerations.
RulingsDirector review decision- Other 314aInstitution denied discretionary otherDenied
“Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of discretionary considerations, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 1
Discretionary denialPatents in suitUS 7,120,832 - Ipr2025-01455Institution deniedPTAB · Dec 18, 2025 · IPR2025-01455 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Director review
The Director denied institution of IPR2025-01455 after review of discretionary considerations.
RulingsDirector review decision- Other 314aInstitution denied discretionary otherInstitution denied
“Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of discretionary considerations, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 1
Discretionary denialPatents in suitUS 11,286,168 - Ipr2025-01453Institution deniedPTAB · Dec 18, 2025 · IPR2025-01453 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Director review
The Director denied institution of IPR2025-01453 after review of discretionary considerations.
RulingsDirector review decision- Director reviewDirector review, deniedDenied
“Before JOHN A. SQUIRES, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.” slip op. at 1
- Other 314aInstitution denied discretionary otherInstitution denied
“Before JOHN A. SQUIRES, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.” slip op. at 1
Discretionary denialPatents in suitUS 8,400,835 - Ipr2025-01451Institution deniedPTAB · Dec 18, 2025 · IPR2025-01451 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Director review
The Director denied institution of IPR2025-01451 after review of discretionary considerations.
RulingsDirector review decision- Other 314aInstitution denied discretionary otherInstitution denied
“Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of discretionary considerations, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 1
Discretionary denialPatents in suitUS 7,969,231 - Ipr2025-01449Institution deniedPTAB · Dec 18, 2025 · IPR2025-01449 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Director review
Institution of IPR2025-01449 challenging U.S. Patent No. 8,593,888 is denied after review of discretionary considerations.
RulingsDirector review decision- Director reviewDirector review, deniedDenied
“Before JOHN A. SQUIRES, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.” slip op. at 1
- Other 314aInstitution denied discretionary otherInstitution denied
“Before JOHN A. SQUIRES, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. NOTICE Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of discretionary considerations, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 1
Discretionary denialPatents in suitUS 8,593,888 - Ipr2025-01443Institution deniedPTAB · Dec 18, 2025 · IPR2025-01443 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Director review
The Director denied institution of IPR2025-01443 after reviewing discretionary considerations.
RulingsDirector review decision- Other 314aInstitution denied discretionary otherInstitution denied
“Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of discretionary considerations, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 1
Discretionary denialPatents in suitUS 12,015,375 - Ipr2025-01435Institution deniedPTAB · Dec 18, 2025 · IPR2025-01435 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Director review
The Director denied institution of IPR2025-01435 after reviewing discretionary considerations.
RulingsDirector review decision- Director reviewDirector review, deniedDenied
“Before JOHN A. SQUIRES, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.” slip op. at 1
- Other 314aInstitution denied discretionary otherInstitution denied
“Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of discretionary considerations, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 1
Discretionary denialPatents in suitUS 10,793,916 - Ipr2025-01434Institution deniedPTAB · Dec 18, 2025 · IPR2025-01434 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Director review
The Director denied institution of IPR2025-01434 after reviewing discretionary considerations under § 314(a).
RulingsDirector review decision- Other 314aInstitution denied discretionary otherInstitution denied
“Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of discretionary considerations, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 1
Discretionary denialPatents in suitUS 11,149,306 - Ipr2025-01433Institution deniedPTAB · Dec 18, 2025 · IPR2025-01433 · APJ John A Squires · IPR · Director review
The Director denied institution of IPR2025-01433 after review of discretionary considerations under § 314(a).
RulingsDirector review decision- Director reviewDirector review, deniedDenied
“Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after review of discretionary considerations, institution of inter partes review is denied in the following proceedings:” slip op. at 1
Discretionary denialPatents in suitUS 7,629,634
Holdings, summaries, rulings, issues, outcomes, winners and claim constructions shown for a decision were generated by a large language model reading the opinion. They are a guide to the decision, not the decision. Confirm every one against the court's own text before relying on it. Outcomes read from the patent owner’s side. Party names are extracted from the decision and are missing on about 900 short Director denials and scans, which carry the trial number instead.